Zambia’s Securities and Exchange Commission’ Deals With a Search Engine Marketing Disaster as it Loses Prestigious Google Ranking Position as Top 10 Investment Advice Source On the Internet

by Jerry Sakala, Search Engine Marketing Advisor

Well now you know that Zambia’s Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) was ranked among the top 10 providers of investment advice on the planet by Google? Thats well ahead of 3,300,000 competitors in the world.Its a prestigious Google ranking that creates instant credibilty,brand recognition and trust that resonated with 27,100 ready able and willing unique investors searching Google  every month for “investment advice”.

So what was the problem?  where are the investors? Where are the enquiries, phone calls and emails from cash -loaded investors eager to get investment advice from Zambia’s SEC.

Like I said there is a problem that went unoticed for days by the SEC…AND UNLESS it is dealt with THE utmost urgency it deserve, THIS may well be dubbed the worst blunder in Zambia’s financial history.

Firstly you  need to appreciate the demanding skill,expense and expertise that goes into achieving such enviable position hat only the world major financial publishng houses are enjoying be it at HUGE costs; the likes of by Motely Fool,Forbes,Moneyweek,Investment U, street.com, investmentadviceonline.com and now SEC. As the saying goes the higher they go the harder they fall. Its a search engine marketibg disaster of 2009…

The implications are too disastrous to ponder.Once this overlooked problem hits the blogoshere, get ready to shut down the SEC,suspend trading on LSE, declare a bank  holiday in Zambia.Literaly suspend all electronic transaction until this problem is declared SOLVED.

In less than two minutes you are about to discover the BIGGEST risk facing financial websites due to poor adherance to SEO  best practice…best practice being the appliction of systematic holistic SEO marketing strategies and tactics that take into account Technical and coding considerations, indepth content analysis, key word and phrse analysis spam evaluation and risk assessment,searcher usability etc..

In short well trained SEO Marketers who care to understand and apply effective and ethical ways to increase site positioning and conversion for the whole site not . Only SEO Marketers who cre to protect ns preserve reputation can do this and are worthy of such startegic roles.
 

Are you ready?

Before this post, when you typed in “investment advice” Zambia Securities and Exchange Commission “investor information web page appeared among the top 10.Now its been shunted to oblivion.

Search engine marketing Disaster of 2009 indeed.Now visit www.sec.gov.zm  you will find that an unscuplous hacker has removed the original “investment advice” page and written a mesage that says in part..” i have hacked your site…F**k

For a  Securities and Exchange authority site ,Government website (.gov) for that matter, this is tottally unacceptable level of exposure especially for financial related website.The damage to reputaion and ecoomy could take years repair. Where does that leave Lusaka Stock Exchange,Banks,ZRA…GO check t now… www.sec.gov.zm (you might find message “this website will be Restored but try navigating the pages). www.sec.gov.zm

Review Your Bank’s Financial Privacy Rating Now

The  federal law, the Financial Services Modernization Act, enables banks to affiliate with insurance companies and brokerage firms under one corporate roof. These “financial supermarkets” are said to offer the promise of integrated services, lower costs, and new products. But the law also has significant privacy implications.

 These new “financial supermarkets” can easily share customer data with one another by merging databases The practice of affiliates sharing information is not new. But, combining personal data from multiple companies means that customer profiles of unprecedented scope can be created from the merged databases of the affiliated companies. In this new financial marketplace, it is more important than ever for consumers to shop carefully for their banks, credit card companies, insurance companies, and brokerage services.

If you are concerned about your privacy — how your customer data is used, merged and disclosed — you will want to learn as much as you can about the privacy provisions of this new law, also called the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB) after its Congressional authors. GLB became law in 1999 and was implemented in 2001.

The privacy provisions of GLB require companies that sell financial services to mail you privacy notices that explain: How your personal financial and other information is collected. How your information is used. How you can opt-out, that is say “no” to having your information shared, sold or otherwise disclosed to outside companies. However, the law does not require companies to ask your consent before sharing your data with their affiliates. Nor does the company have to get your consent before sharing your information with outside companies that have a joint marketing agreement with your company.

Consumer advocates consider these exceptions to be a significant shortcoming of the GLB. We will explain this further below, when we discuss how to shop for financial privacy. Banks, credit card companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, and other kinds of financial institutions must issue privacy notices annually. The American Banker’s Association estimated that each household receives between 10 and 15 privacy notices each year.. You only need to opt-out once. So, if you have taken advantage of your financial companies’ opt-out provisions already, you do not need to do it again. Most financial institutions are in strict compliance with the privacy provisions of GLB. That is, they give you the right to opt-out if their practice is to share information with outside companies. But some are going beyond the law’s requirements by offering stronger privacy protection than the law requires.

This guide will help you shop for financial privacy by explaining how you can recognize those companies that go the extra mile. Here are a few “extras” to look for in the privacy notices you receive. If the company’s privacy notice includes one or more of these provisions, it is giving you more privacy than is required. The company does not sell your customer data to outside companies, even though the law says it can. The company makes it easy for you to opt-out by providing a check-off form and a postage-paid envelope. The company provides a toll-free number with “live” customer service representatives to record your opt-out preferences. The company gives you other opt-out choices such as the ability to stop data sharing among affiliates and joint marketers.

 If you do not want your customer information to be merged to form comprehensive data profiles, this provision is particularly important. The company has specific procedures for handling your medical information. The company uses clear language with specific examples of terms. The company offers to give you its privacy notice in a language other than English. The company invites you to review your records and correct inaccurate information. The company gives you additional privacy tips. For example, it tells you how to remove your name from national mailing lists, telemarketing lists, and lists for pre-approved offers of credit. Be warned: Most privacy policies are not written in language that is easy to understand. It is not always clear that the company is actually going beyond the requirements of the GLB.

The following sections describe how you can determine how privacy-friendly your financial institution is. Does the company sell your information? GLB does not prevent a company from selling a customer’s personal information to outside companies (usually referred to in notices as third-party nonaffiliated companies).

The law only requires the company to tell you about its policy and the way you can opt-out. If you do not opt-out, the company is free to sell, lease or otherwise disclose almost anything in its files about you — except your account number and other means of access to your account, such as PIN numbers.

So, if a company’s privacy policy says it does not sell information to outside companies, it is going beyond what the law allows it to do. In this situation, you will probably not be given a form to fill out or a toll-free number to call. That is because you do not need to opt-out. This may be an important consideration if you fear your income, account balances, purchase history, and other customer data will end up in databases that create comprehensive profiles about you. Does the company make it easy to opt-out? Companies are only required to give you a “reasonable” way to opt-out. You usually have a choice of: Sending a letter to a specific address. Calling a toll-free number. Opting out online, if that is how you normally do business. If you want to opt-out by mail, you must usually write a letter and pay for the postage. Unfortunately, companies are only required to give you an opt-out address. However, some companies make things easier by attaching a check-off form. But beware that some check-off forms ask you to include your Social Security number (SSN) and account number. If the company asks you to include such information on a postcard form, find out if the company will accept the form inside an envelope or by providing only the last four digits of your SSN. A few companies even provide a postage-paid envelope. This goes beyond what companies have to do.

Many, but not all, provide a toll-free number to call. And some provide an e-mail address or web site for opting out. Does the company give other opt-out choices, such as an opt-out for affiliate sharing? Most companies freely share personal information with their affiliated companies, that is, companies under common ownership. The only chance you have to prevent information sharing among related companies is to opt-out under another law, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Notice of your right to opt-out under the FCRA is likely to be included with the GLB privacy notice you receive. The FCRA says you can say “no” to having a company share “creditworthiness” information among affiliates. This simply means you can prevent sharing of how you pay your bills (on time, late, never) and what your credit score is. However, the FCRA does not give you the ability to prevent your most sensitive “transaction and experience” data from being shared with affiliates. Where you shop, your purchase history, the charities you support, your religious affiliation, the political candidates you support, the medical facilities you use, your entertainment choices – in short, where you write checks and use credit cards – can all be disclosed to company affiliates. Some banks have well over 1,000 affiliates.

Some companies give you the opportunity to tell them you do not want to get offers from them or their affiliate companies. If you are tired of receiving unsolicited offers from your bank, look for a telephone number or address in the privacy notice to opt-out of such marketing offers. The notice might also give you the choice of opting-out of all sharing of information among a company’s affiliates. This is an especially important provision if you want to limit the customer information that is compiled in data profiles. Some companies go a step further and provide information about how to stop unwanted offers that do not come under the GLB Act. For example, the privacy notices you receive may give you the address to remove your name from national mailing lists, telemarketing lists, or lists for pre-approved credit offers. (See PRC Fact Sheet 1, “Privacy Survival Guide,” www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs1-surv.htm.)

 Does the company tell you how it treats medical information? The GLB covers information in the files of financial companies. You may not think your bank would have medical information about you in its files. But, it certainly could — if it were to receive information from its affiliated health insurance company, for example, or were to take note of your checks or credit card payments to medical facilities. Unfortunately, GLB does not give consumers any special protection for medical information. Remember, the merging of these giant industries — not privacy — is the main purpose of GLB.

Medical information, like almost everything else about you, can be shared with outside companies unless you opt-out. You have almost no ability to limit access of your medical information among affiliated companies. The privacy notices of a few companies say they limit the use of your medical information with outside companies. Some also say they limit access of medical information among affiliates – although they are not required to do this. Most privacy notices don’t mention medical information at all.

Some state legislatures are stepping in to protect medical information. In 2000, the California Legislature passed a law that prohibits an insurance company from disclosing information to a financial institution for the purpose of granting credit (California Civil Code 56.26). The GLB insurance regulations adopted by each state might also give you more rights to medical privacy.

Does the company use legalese or straight talk? Federal regulations do not require a company to tell you exactly what kinds of information it collects or discloses. The company only has to tell you the categories of information, with examples of each category. For instance, all companies collect “application information,” that is, information you provide when opening an account or applying for a loan. Privacy notices from some companies might simply state that they obtain application information from you – without explaining what that means. That is an example of legalese, not straight-talk. Other companies spell it out and tell you the information you supply on an application could include your name, Social Security number, date of birth, income, debts, and so on. Another example of legalese is the term “nonpublic personal information.” Most of the privacy policies we have examined do not describe what this means. Nor do they clearly explain the opposite term, “publicly available information.” (See PRC Fact Sheet 24a for an explanation of these terms, “Financial Privacy: How to Read Your ‘Opt-Out’ Notice,” www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs24a-optout.htm.)

Does the company offer to send you a privacy notice in your own language? For most English-speaking consumers, privacy notices are, at best, difficult to understand. This means that important rights and choices are easily overlooked. For non-English speaking customers, exercising the rights to privacy is nearly impossible since companies are not required to give notices in languages other than English. But some companies provide notices in other languages. If your company offers to send you its privacy policy in your own language, it is going beyond what the law requires. Does the company invite you to correct inaccurate information? GLB says nothing about your ability to look at the contents of your financial files. Nor does GLB say anything about your right to correct inaccurate information.

A few privacy notices state that the company wants to make sure you can correct anything in your file that is wrong. It is a good idea to review your file, especially if you have disputed erroneous data that has been disclosed to a credit reporting agency (CRA). For example, your bank’s records might show a series of late payments on a credit card that you have disputed with a CRA. If the CRA investigated and found that the entry should be removed from your credit report, it should also have been removed from your bank’s records. If your bank continues to sell or share this erroneous information with outside companies (or even shares it with its own affiliates), your credit score and ability to get credit could be adversely affected. What can you do if you don’t like your company’s privacy policy? If you are not satisfied with your company’s privacy policy, we recommend that you write the company and complain. Of course, your opt-out is another way of telling the company you do not like its information-sharing policy. Your letter of complaint and opt-out vote alone will probably not be enough to make a change. However, if enough people write and if large numbers choose to opt-out of information-sharing, companies with minimal privacy protections may be forced to change their policies or lose consumer confidence and loyalty. Keep in mind, GLB does not prevent companies from adopting more consumer-friendly policies. Of course, you can also vote with your feet. Privacy may be important to you.

If you have a choice of dealing with a company that does not sell your personal information or one that does, this might be a key factor in deciding where to keep your accounts. We also recommend that you complain about your lack of financial privacy to your state and federal legislators.

Let them know that you want laws to require financial institutions to more adequately safeguard your privacy. The reason the privacy provisions of the GLB are weak is because financial industry representatives heavily lobbied members of Congress. But the GLB does not prevent state legislatures from passing stronger laws. You may want to contact your state legislators as well. In 2000, about half the states considered measures that would have strengthened the GLB. Each of these bills was defeated by strong industry lobbying.

The only way stronger privacy laws will be enacted is if large numbers of consumers contact their elected representatives. How you can help us monitor the opt-out notices. The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse is collecting as many financial privacy notices as we can. You can help us by sending the opt-out notices that you receive, or a photocopy of those notices. Please mail them to the address listed at the top of page one. We are also interested in knowing if you have difficulty opting out. Was the toll-free number difficult to use? Were instructions unclear for mailing your opt-out preferences?

If you use an online financial service, were you able to opt-out by e-mail or the company’s web site? Contact information is provided at the top of this fact sheet. RESOURCES Other PRC Financial Privacy Fact Sheets: source Fact Sheet 24. “Financial Privacy in the New Millennium: The Burden Is on You,” www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs24-finpriv.htm

If It Happened At Whole Foods and Google, It Can Happen To Your Company

Jul. 12 – CEO John Mackey posted comments under an alias in a Yahoo finance forum from 1999 through 2006.

 

If you work for a listed firm on any of the African stock Exchanges, You can avoid the actual and perceived improper use of your employer’s  information. Avoid any impression that statements are being made on behalf of your employer. Unless approved by your employer, you  may make any post on this  Kwacha Offshore sponsored blog. In fact apply this advice to  similar forum, concerning any matter involving your employer, its competitors or vendors, either under your name, anonymously, under a screen name, or communicating through another person. Violation of such policy has resulted in dismissal for an employee at Google. .  Mark Jen, a former Google employee, started blogging about his impressions of the company when he was first hired and was let go within one month.  A Delta Airlines flight attendant was fired after posting inappropriate content of herself in her Delta Airlines uniform.  Friendster released an employee after she was overly candid about her work experiences there.

Don’t let it happen to you on this blog.

How Near Are Products Of Companies Listed On African Stock Exchanges From This Youtube Risk?

 A Youtube video posted a while back, some guy opened a supposedly
indestructible Kryptonite bike lock with a ball point pen in about
10 seconds.

Then he made a video of it and posted it to the
Internet. It caught on like wildfire, with millions of
views in just days.

The backlash was incredible. The bike lock company
tried to do some damage control, but it was too far
gone. And today, this once powerful force in the lock
industry now struggles to keep its head above water.

And all because of one little youtube post.

So how far is your product in Zambia from this risk?

Who Cares About Blog Compliance During An IPO In Zambia?

If the lack of comments on this blog are a result of poor or no monitoring capabilities by companies in Zambia then it leaves a lot to be desired.

One would have taken it for granted that the likes of Access Bank, Finance Bank, Celtel Zambia or MTN Zambia would have been alerted. I hope Im wrong that the key personnel of these leading corporations in Zambia are mentioned but not monitored in blogosphere.

I particulary mention these companies because they have publicly expressed interest (Celtel already concluded) undertaking Initial Public Offerings (IPO) in Zambia on the Lusaka Stock Exchange.

I take it given the risks lack of social media complianc can pause such as was the case with Accoona Im rather concerned.

Vice President of the Republic of Zambia emphasised the need for thr “importation” of best practices as a way of making Zambia a more attractive  investment destination. I wouldn’t agree more with him. I beleive social media governance, risk management and compliance is one area that must be addressed…quickly.The stakes are too high to leave blogosphere to endanger our Zambia’s economic empowerment.

So who cares? Will the company in Zambia please stand out on this blog!

 

Have You Noticed How Much Risk Lusaka Stock Exchange Listed Companies Are Exposed To In Social Media Today?

Let me ask you a few questions that will help you determine how much Zambian listed companies are exposed to the treacherous risks and power in social media, but before I do that , listed here are major US corporations which have recently succumbed to the rising influence of social media;

 Dell Computers-dissatisfied customer’s blog posts populary known as “Dell Hell” has resulted in eventual introduction of direct2dell corporate blog.

 AOL-a negative customer service experience recorded and audio podcast spreading like wild fire doing great damage to reputation.

 Kryptonite Locks- a customer’s Youtube video demonstration of poor quality of it’s bicycle lock product that resulted in over $10 million in replacements.

 Apple Computers- investors lost billions as a result of its share price drop following a blogpost on engadget.com.

 Accoona Search Engine and Electronics Retailer- Founder Marc Russou paid bloggers in support of his innocence in a previous stock fraud case where he had pled guilty. The blog posts are being considered to have violated the quiet Period required by the United States SEC before and after an IPO. No official ruling has been made, but the possibility certainly exists, for Accoona’s IPO to be suspended or terminated.

This list continues to grow everyday, So now can l ask you the following…

1. Do Zambian listed companies have a social media usage policy for employees that is not just for internal purposes but covers private blogging outside working hours on social networking sites such as Wikipedia, Lusakatimes.com, Youtube.com, Facebook.com, myspace.com etc. Have Zambian companies left it up to employees to set their own blogging policy? With today’s workforce that’s more computer and internet literate than at any other time in the history of Zambia, a clearly defined social media usage policy can guide employees from going too far over the line. Certain company information should not be discussed on blogosphere. It may be inappropriate or illegal. When an employee makes a statement on blogosphere it can spread like wild fire. A social media Usage policy to govern, manage risk and ensure compliance makes it clear what is acceptable and was in not.

2. Do Zambian listed companies monitor discussions / conversations about the companies’ key personnel, products, company information, investors etc. in social media using free monitoring tools such as Google Alert and Technorati services to get notified in real time when it is mentioned.

3. Do Zambian listed companies identify and analyse specifically mentions with positive or negative comments? Identifying the level of influence of the blogger in such cases is critical to determine action to take in order to mitigate any damage that may be caused from someone posting wrong information.

4. Do Zambian listed companies monitor for stakeholder complaint discussion or conversations on blogosphere to know the quality of relationship experienced by stakeholders eg customers, suppliers, investors etc.? Identifying quality of service or product defects early in the process can ultimately save Zambian companies’ money, and reputation.

5. Do Zambian listed companies monitor for discussions of intellectual property and confidential information. It can be dangerous when wrong info is posted. Documented\confidential information, salary and compensation information, usernames and passwords, non-public financial results or reports, pre-patent publications and secret formulas must be safeguarded.

6. Do Zambian listed companies perform analysis to gain business value from content about Zambian companies in blogosphere monitoring how posts are changing on blogosphere week to week, month to month compared to competition.

7. Do Zambian listed companies investigate specific blog posts specifically what it’s most influential bloggers know or don’t know about Zambian companies. This can be a less costly but equally effective form of focus group analysis as bloggers are by their independence able to distribute news faster than bureaucratic mainstream media.

 8. Do Zambian listed companies have a dedicated team or person responsible for informing relevant departments on blogosphere activities as well as reacting and conducting damage control if necessary. A compliance team or officer should Know if any info discussed could be considered controversial or in bad taste or violate company social media policy or security and exchange commission (SEC) rules and regulations. Zambian listed companies could be unnecessarily be exposed to litigation, fines or damage to reputation.

9. Do Zambian listed companies taken action to have blog posts removed deleted by the publishers’ where a scandalous post is discovered? If any blogger affiliated with the company posts a comment on blogosphere against company policy have Zambian companies asked the individual to remove the post? Where posts are discovered to applaud or chastise Zambian companies has the blogger been contacted to hear more about their compliments and how the company can improve?

10. Do Zambian listed companies know if they have lost confidential information via social media? Over 50% of company’s do not know if they have. In addition less than 9% have policies pertaining to social media usage to ensure proper governance, risk management and compliance.

 

In the next post I will uncover a number of Zambian companies looking to list on the Lusaka Stock Exchange (LuSE) as they are exposed to the social media risk.

Social Media Governance The New Niche On The Block.

With every technology comes new opportunities… and risks. Social media has its own. I have picked Social edia Goverance, risk mangement and compliance as my area of expertise to excell in.

On this blog I hope to share my experiences along the way. I share it all. the joys,frustrations .

 

I’m working with Rich Schefren as my coach to build an outstanding Social Media Governanace Risk Management and Compliance business providing expertise to small and medium sized financial firms.

 

I recognise guys such as Aaron Newman author of “Enterprise 2.0 Implmentation” and CEO at Techrigy (thanks for SM2 by the way, awesome) and ofcourse Nicolla Mattina  out there in Italy .(I hope to learn a heck of a lot from you.)

 

So this was just to introduce myself to the emerging industry of  Social Media Governanace Risk Management and Compliance.

 

More about me at http://linkedin.com/in/jerrysakala